Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the trueness and precision of five intraoral scanners (Emerald S, iTero Element 5D, Medit i700, Primescan, and Trios 4) and two indirect digitization techniques for both teeth and soft tissues on fresh mandibular and maxillary cadaver jaws. METHODS: The maxilla and mandible of a fully dentate cadaver were scanned by the ATOS industrial scanner to create a master model. Then, the specimens were scanned eight times by each intraoral scanner (IOS). In addition, 8 polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) impressions were made and digitized with a Medit T710 desktop scanner. Stone models were then poured and again scanned with the desktop scanner. All IOS, PVS, and stone models were compared to the master model to calculate the mean absolute surface deviation for mandibular teeth, maxillary teeth, and palate. RESULTS: For mandibular teeth, the PVS trueness was only significantly better than the Medit i700 (p < 0.001) and Primescan (p < 0.05). In maxillary teeth, the PVS trueness was significantly better than all IOSs (p < 0.05-0.001); the stone trueness was significantly better than Emerald S (p < 0.01), Medit i700 (p < 0.001) and Primescan (p < 0.01). In the palate, PVS and stone trueness were significantly lower than the iTero Element 5D (p < 0.01) and Trios 4 (p < p < 0.01). Stone trueness was significantly lower than the Medit i700 (p < 0.05). The precision in the palate was significantly lower for PVS and stone than for Emerald S (p < 0.01, p < 0.05), iTero Element 5D (p < 0.01, p < 0.01), Primescan (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), and Trios 4 (p < 0.001, p < 0.01). Significant differences in trueness between the IOSs were observed only in the mandibular teeth. The Medit i700 performed worse than Emerald S (p < 0.01) and iTero Element 5D (p < 0.01). For mandibular teeth, the Medit i700 was significantly more precise than Primescan (p < 0.01) and the Emerald S (p < 0.05). The Trios 4 was significantly less precise than Emerald S (p < 0.05). The precision of Medit i700 was significantly worse than iTero Element 5D (p < 0.01) for maxillary teeth, as well as the Primescan (p < 0.01) and Trios 4 (p < 0.05) for the palate. CONCLUSIONS: In general, indirectly digitized models from PVS impressions had higher trueness than IOS for maxillary teeth; precision between the two methods was similar. IOS was more accurate for palatal tissues. The differences in trueness and precision for mandibular teeth between the various techniques were negligible. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: All investigated IOSs and indirect digitization could be used for complete arch scanning in mandibular and maxillary dentate arches. However, direct optical digitization is preferable for the palate due to the low accuracy of physical impression techniques for soft tissues.

Evaluation of Prosthetic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With 3D-Printed Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to quantify the number and type of prosthetic complications associated with 3D-printed implant-supported fixed prostheses (3DISFP) and to evaluate patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life over a four-month period. METHODS:  Fifteen edentulous patients who underwent implant therapy were included in the study. Each patient received a 3D-printed prosthesis using OnX dental resin. Prosthetic complications were documented, and data from the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire were collected at two time points: at enrollment and during a four-month recall. RESULTS: During the four-month evaluation period, a total of nine complications were recorded, with three classified as catastrophic failures. Statistical analysis revealed statistically significant differences in OHIP scores between the preoperative and postoperative assessments (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that utilizing 3D-printed prostheses with OnX resin represents a viable alternative for long-term implant-supported temporaries. The patients experienced a significant improvement in their oral health-related quality of life. These results suggest that 3D printing technology, combined with the use of OnX resin, holds promise in providing satisfactory clinical outcomes and enhanced patient satisfaction. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study, and further research is warranted to validate these findings and explore the long-term performance and durability of 3D-printed implant-supported fixed prostheses. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of 3D printing technology in implant dentistry. The results highlight the potential of 3DISFP with OnX resin to improve oral health-related quality of life in edentulous patients. Continued advancements in 3D printing materials and techniques will likely expand the utilization of these prostheses, ultimately benefiting patients in need of implant-supported restorations.

Accuracy of 3D printed scan bodies for dental implants using two additive manufacturing systems: An in vitro study.

This study compared the accuracy of implant scan bodies printed using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) technologies to the control (manufacturer's scan body) Scan bodies were printed using SLA (n = 10) and DLP (n = 10) methods. Ten manufacturer's scan bodies were used as control. The scan body was placed onto a simulated 3D printed cast with a single implant placed. An implant fixture mount was used as standard. The implant positions were scanned using a laboratory scanner with the fixture mounts, manufacturer's scan bodies, and the printed scan bodies. The scans of each scan body was then superimposed onto the referenced fixture mount. The 3D angulation and linear deviations were measured. The angulation and linear deviations were 1.24±0.22° and 0.20±0.05 mm; 2.63±0.82° and 0.34±0.11 mm; 1.79±0.19° and 0.32±0.03 mm; for the control, SLA, and DLP, respectively. There were statistical differences (ANOVA) among the three groups in the angular (p<0.01) or linear deviations (p<0.01). Box plotting, 95% confidence interval and F-test suggested the higher variations of precision in the SLA group compared to DLP and control groups. Scan bodies printed in-office have lower accuracy compared to the manufacturer's scan bodies. The current technology for 3D printing of implant scan bodies needs trueness and precision improvements.

Effect of Print Angulation on Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed Models.

Additive manufacturing processes are increasingly being used in dentistry. The underlying process is the polymerization or fusion of material layer by layer to create layer lines on the final printed surface. How print orientation affects these layer lines is unclear. The primary objective of this research was to measure and compare the surface waviness and surface roughness of maxillary models fabricated using a variety of 3D printers and resin types, and to evaluate the effect of different print angulations. The same STL file was used to manufacture 48 models using a variety of resins and printers at 0 degrees, 30 degrees (with base supports), and 70 degrees ("vertical" without supports) to the build plate. Six replications with each angulation were printed. All samples were optically scanned with a laser profilometer and compared. The results indicated that print angulation can significantly affect the surface roughness of 3D-printed objects, but the results seemed to be specific to the resin/printer products and angles. The authors concluded that surface waviness values should be considered whenever surface smoothness is evaluated.

Marginal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In Vitro Study Using Micro-CT Technology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the marginal fit of CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns made from lithium disilicate and zirconia using two different fabrication protocols (model and model-less). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty anterior all ceramic restorations (20 lithium disilicate, 20 zirconia) were fabricated from digital impressions using a CEREC Bluecam scanner. Two different digital workflows were used: a fully digital model-less approach and a printed model digital approach. The crowns were cemented on the respective prepared typodont teeth and marginal gap was evaluated using Micro-CT. Each specimen was analyzed in sagittal and trans-axial orientations, allowing evaluation of the marginal fit (vertical and horizontal) on each surface. Logarithmic transformation was used with a significance of 0.05. After that a reliability analysis was performed by re-measuring four randomized selected images for each specimen and performing intraclass correlations to determine any systematic bias in the measurements. RESULTS: Vertical measurements in the lingual, distal and mesial views had an estimated marginal gap ranging from 101.9 to 133.9 µm for lithium disilicate crowns and 126.4 to 165.4 µm for zirconia. No significant differences were found between model and model-less techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Both workflows are valid protocols for the fabrication of monolithic ceramic restorations. The use of a printed model did not improve the marginal fit of lithium disilicate or zirconia crowns. Both materials are also clinically acceptable, no matter which workflow was used to obtain the restoration.

Comparing Initial Wound Healing and Osteogenesis of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal and Titanium Alloy Materials.

Porous tantalum trabecular metal (PTTM) has long been used in orthopedics to enhance neovascularization, wound healing, and osteogenesis; recently, it has been incorporated into titanium alloy dental implants. However, little is known about the biological responses to PTTM in the human oral cavity. We have hypothesized that, compared with conventional titanium alloy, PTTM has a greater expression of genes specific to neovascularization, wound healing, and osteogenesis during the initial healing period. Twelve subjects requiring at least 4 implants in the mandible were enrolled. Four 3 × 5mm devices, including 2 titanium alloy tapered screws and 2 PTTM cylinders, were placed in the edentulous mandibular areas using a split-mouth design. One device in each group was trephined for analysis at 2 and 4 weeks after placement. RNA microarray analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis were used to analyze osteogenesis gene expression and relevant signaling pathways. Compared to titanium alloy, PTTM samples exhibited significantly higher expressions of genes specific to cell neovascularization, wound healing, and osteogenesis. Several genes-including bone morphogenic proteins, collagens, and growth factors-were upregulated in the PTTM group compared to the titanium alloy control. PTTM materials may enhance the initial healing of dental implants by modifying gene expression profiles.

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of a maxillary midline diastema: A clinical report.

A maxillary midline diastema (MMD) is a common complaint of dental patients. An MMD can be closed with treatment from different disciplines, including operative dentistry and orthodontics. A comprehensive smile analysis is also a necessity before beginning treatment. This article highlights the closure of a 3-mm MMD by using a combination of orthodontics and direct composite resin restorations.